This man is clearly in need of some professional help.
First, he publically called for the assassination of the President of Venezuela. Granted, he apologized (perhaps realizing that is a felony in the United States), he did but did not recant. Then, he claimed that Hurricane Katrina was somehow caused by legalized abortion.
And now:
I just returned from Mass, and what I heard there was vastly different.
The answer must be: of course not. As Pope John Paul II said, "truth cannot contradict truth". If Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection accurately describes the evolution of life on Earth - if it's true - then it cannot be incompatible with Christianity. Is Genesis literally true? Of course not; some of the earliest Church Fathers said as much. For one thing, there are two different accounts of creation there. And just in case anybody was unclear on the idea of mythopœic cosmogenesis, the first chapter of John's Gospel should pretty much clear up the concept.
They're myths, people. They are an inspired attempt to speak Truth, not facts. Genesis tells us about God and about the people who worshipped Him, and about how to live, not about exactly how the physics of cosmogenesis works.
Science seeks to understand how the universe works. Faith seeks to understand why and what to do now.
Science may eventually unravel the secrets of time and space, but it cannot describe an Eternal God who transcends time, an omnipotent God who transcends space.
Anyway, I'm going to Shakabrah to write now. Maybe I actually will manage something.
First, he publically called for the assassination of the President of Venezuela. Granted, he apologized (perhaps realizing that is a felony in the United States), he did but did not recant. Then, he claimed that Hurricane Katrina was somehow caused by legalized abortion.
And now:
I'd like to say to the good citizens of Dover: If there is a disaster in your area, don't turn to God, you just rejected Him from your city... If they have future problems in Dover, I recommend they call on Charles Darwin. Maybe he can help them.While I'm willing to grant Pascal's assertion that occasionally we catch glimpses of reality which transcend reason (more or less his definition of Christianity), it does not follow that Christians are required to be nonsensical.
I just returned from Mass, and what I heard there was vastly different.
(F)rom the greatness and the beauty of created thingsIn answer to Mr. Robertson's anti-science, I ask: can science contradict the Christian faith?
their original author, by analogy, is seen.
The answer must be: of course not. As Pope John Paul II said, "truth cannot contradict truth". If Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection accurately describes the evolution of life on Earth - if it's true - then it cannot be incompatible with Christianity. Is Genesis literally true? Of course not; some of the earliest Church Fathers said as much. For one thing, there are two different accounts of creation there. And just in case anybody was unclear on the idea of mythopœic cosmogenesis, the first chapter of John's Gospel should pretty much clear up the concept.
They're myths, people. They are an inspired attempt to speak Truth, not facts. Genesis tells us about God and about the people who worshipped Him, and about how to live, not about exactly how the physics of cosmogenesis works.
Science seeks to understand how the universe works. Faith seeks to understand why and what to do now.
Science may eventually unravel the secrets of time and space, but it cannot describe an Eternal God who transcends time, an omnipotent God who transcends space.
Anyway, I'm going to Shakabrah to write now. Maybe I actually will manage something.
Tags:
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 05:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 09:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 05:06 pm (UTC)This is the same man who opposed to sanctions against South Africa long after people and governments around the world had settled the immorality of apartheid. (he had holdings there).
He called Mobutu Sese Seko "a fine Christian". This fine 'Christian' massacred his own people in the Republic of Congo but two weeks before PAT said this.
I have trouble telling if he's evil or barking mad.
I used to think he was funny. Now he's just downright annoying.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 09:20 pm (UTC)Sounds like a poll!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 05:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 05:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 05:48 pm (UTC)I try to be a good Buddhist about the likes of Pat Robertson. I try to look at him as a sign post. Granted, I tend to think he's a sign post for stupidity... hence, why I am trying to be good. =)
He reminds me every time I see him to avoid the evils of judgment. He reminds me to share knowledge with anyone who wants to listen, to build community wherever I may, and to make sure I speak with compassion in my heart rather than ignorance.
And, then there are days when I can't be such a good Buddhist and simply wish a house would fall on him.
We cannot all think and believe the same way. I suspect for Mr. Robertson this is the stuff of which his nightmares are made.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 07:28 pm (UTC)Well, we're all still human, after all! I confess to moments of anger with these sorts of folks, and Mr. Robertson in particular. I try to be a good Christian.
But imagine if he were a Buddhist and saying these things. That's how I feel. Not only disgusted that a member of my own species is saying these things, but a person who ostensibly believes the universe works the same way I do is saying these things.
*shudder*
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 08:07 pm (UTC)I understand your consternation, though. Lucky for me, Buddhists don't generally say the kind of ignorant shit Robertson does, but I know that there are people professing to be Buddhist who have absolutely no compassion or appreciation, and such people say some pretty horrible things. Like when the tsunami hit, there was an american tibetan dude who made absurd comments that were all doctrine and no feeling (you may recall I ranted about him for some time). So, Robertson is like that, but with venom and a dose of crazy.
You are neither uncompassionate nor crazy, so I don't think you need to feel that he is in any way related to you. He's a troll, you're a Thom.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 08:15 pm (UTC)When the initial shock of his statements wears off, I'm not so much angry as sorrowful.
Ostensibly...
Date: 2005-11-11 09:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 05:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 07:12 pm (UTC)Mea culpa!
As for why, this says it way better and more complete than I could:
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20050826.html
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-12 04:16 am (UTC)RE: They're myths
Date: 2005-11-11 06:18 pm (UTC)But of course these people also misinterpret a lot of the parables Jesus told. My favorite being the parable of the good Samaritan and why it was so weird that he stopped to help the man. Most just interpret it as helping a stranger when in fact it was helping someone of a different faith than you without judgement just because they needed help.
Anyway...there you are. :)
Re: They're myths
Date: 2005-11-11 07:23 pm (UTC)All they have to do is read the Catechism (CCC 115-119). It really is quite explicit.
In passing, I should note that I don't mean that myths aren't true, just that they aren't factual. Just as mathematics is in some sense the language of science, so myth is the language of religion.
Re: They're myths
Date: 2005-11-11 09:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 06:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 07:00 pm (UTC)I very much like your definitions of Science and Faith.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 07:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-11 11:50 pm (UTC)James 1:26
NIV If anyone considers himself religious and yet does not keep a tight rein on his tongue, he deceives himself and his religion is worthless.
KJV If any man among you seem to be religious , and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain.
2 Peter 2:1-3
NIV But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them - bringing swift destruction on themselves. Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. In their greed these teachers will exploit you with stories they have made up. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping.
KJV But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.
And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.
Yah, it kinda sounds like Robertson to me.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-12 07:46 pm (UTC)From the NAB:
James 1:26
If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his heart, his religion is vain.
2 Peter 2:1-3
There were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will introduce destructive heresies and even deny the Master who ransomed them, bringing swift destruction on themselves.
Many will follow their licentious ways, and because of them the way of truth will be reviled.
In their greed they will exploit you with fabrications, but from of old their condemnation has not been idle and their destruction does not sleep.